“Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard the Space Elevator. Your
first stop will be ‘Hotel Row’ where we will enjoy a 2-hour dinner
under the stars; then we continue on to the Geosynchronous Way
Station where most of you will transfer to an L-5 Colony
shuttlecraft. This entire ride takes 8 days, so sit back and enjoy
the trip from your luxury sleeping quarters”.
This scene may sound like science fiction, but it is not.
According to visionaries, the Space Elevator, a revolutionary means
of transport from Earth to space could become reality by as early
as 2030 or before.
Here is how it will work: A special rocket-launched satellite in
geo-synchronous orbit would drop a ribbon made from nano-materials
to a platform in the sea near the equator. The stationary ribbon
will eventually extend to 62,000 miles high and allow 20-ton
elevator cars to climb into space at 120 mph using electricity
generated from solar-power and lasers.
Two Seattle startups, Michael Laine’s Liftport Group, and Brad Edwards’
Sedco are competing to
build this risky project. Both believe they can do it over the next
couple of decades at a cost of about $20 billion. This radical new
system is expected to lower costs of hauling stuff into space from
$10,000 per pound to $100 and eventually to $10 per pound.
A 200 lb person could travel to space for
$2,000.
This enterprising endeavor promises affordable orbital access,
which will attract entrepreneurs from around the world seeking a
piece of the lucrative space market. PayPal founder Elon Musk,
Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen, and Amazon’s Jeff Bezos are among
the more recognizable names investing in this and other
space-related activities.(cont.)
It’s time to recalibrate those space elevator
predictions. A new study published in the journal Acto
Astronautica claims that the potential for catastrophic wobble
is much higher than previously predicted.
Even if a space elevator could be built, it will need
thrusters attached to it to prevent potentially dangerous amounts
of wobbling, says Lubos Perek of the Czech Academy of Sciences’
Astronomical Institute in Prague. The addition would increase the
difficulty and cost of building and maintaining the elevator. – New
Scientist
Check out this video to see what might befall a space elevator
not supported by thrusters:
Now that’s one extreme, world-class case of whip-lash.
(Editors Note: Earlier today, my colleague at Future Blogger,
Dick Pellitier, had a thoughtful piece on the prospect of a space
elevator. I would like to add my two cents to this debate. The
following article was written this past fall and originally
appeared on TechCentralStation).
In the fall of 1825, New York Governor DeWitt Clinton boarded
the Seneca Chief and traveled 500 miles from Buffalo to New
York City to mark the opening of the Erie Canal. It was the
beginning of an enterprise of immense economic and political
significance in that it expanded the reach of American commerce and
established New York as one of the world’s leading financial
centers.
It is easy, in retrospect, to think the canal’s success was
ordained from the beginning. It wasn’t. In 1810, when DeWitt
Clinton, then mayor of New York City, first proposed building the
363-mile, 83 lock canal, Gouverneur Morris, responded by saying
“Our minds are not yet enlarged to the size of so great an object.”
Another Founding Father, Thomas Jefferson, was more biting in his
criticism, writing to Clinton, “It is a splendid project, and may
be executed a century hence. It is little short of madness to think
of it this day.”
Jefferson’s reasoning was solid. The project was budgeted to
cost $6 million—a sum then equal to three-fourths of the federal
government budget. In fact, the scale of the project was so massive
that it was determined it would be the biggest public works project
since the Great Pyramid and would consist of digging and removing
over 11 million cubic yards of earth. It is no wonder that many
decried it as “Clinton’s ditch.”
Fortunately, Clinton persisted and while he wasn’t able to
persuade the federal government to support the idea, he did win
over the citizens of New York and in 1817 the state legislature
approved the funding for the project. (cont.)