Might Temetics Be the Answer?

June 10 2008 / by Alvis Brigis / In association with Future Blogger.net
Category: Technology   Year: General   Rating: 7 Hot

Memetic scientist and The Meme Machine author Susan Blackmore is pushing a powerful new meme called a “teme”.

“Earth now has three replicators – genes (the basis of life), memes (the basis of human culture) and temes (the basis of technology),” asserts Blackmore, “I argue that the information copied by books, phones, computers and the Internet is the beginning of this third replicator and consequent new evolutionary process.”

The concept is important because it bridges the gap between ideas and technology and lays the foundation for more formalized understanding of what technology is and how it operates.

Here’s her recent TED presentation on the topic:

What’s the future significance? Blackmore happens to think that as we automate temetic processes we could be creating a computational system that ultimately usurps us.

“At the moment temes still need us, but if teme machines became self-replicating then we humans would be redundant and they could carry on without us. ... If anything of our civilisation is to survive then either we have to ensure that climate change and environmental degradation do not kill us off, or self-replicating teme machines must appear before this happens.”

Will temetics save us from ourselves?

or Show Results

The Future of Intellectual Attribution: Quantifying the Massive Idea Sea Requires Convergence

October 22 2008 / by Alvis Brigis
Category: Education   Year: 2018   Rating: 1

Intellectual attribution is far from perfect, but as we systematically quantify the nature of the vast Idea Sea in which we swim, we will also create a more effective and equitable market for new innovations.

Last week a pair of Nobel Prize winning scientists conceded that much of their research had been based on an earlier study by a geneticist who now drives a shuttle for $8/hour just to keep food on the table, but of course didn’t go so far as to offer him a share of the $1.5 million prize they’d been awarded. This example clearly brings into focus the limits of our current idea attribution economy, a system that clearly isn’t encouraging a Nobel-caliber scientist to continue innovating for broader social benefit.

But rather than jump on the IP- and patent-bashing bandwagon as many bloggers tend to do, I’d like to explore how our idea attribution system might evolve over the coming decade.

First, let me be clear about my definition of the term “idea”. Ideas can more specifically be broken down into memes – “ideas or behaviors that can pass from one person to another by learning or imitation”, memeplexes – “groups of religious, cultural, political, and idealogical doctrines and systems”, and temes – “information copied by books, phones, computers and the Internet”. These structures co-evolve with humans to ultimately form a massive sea of what we commonly refer to as ideas. Though individuals often combine memes into valuable new memeplexes, no one person can ever truly claim total ownership of a concept that is essentially an outgrowth of the idea sea.

Continue Reading